Do all scientists believe in carbon dating
When I posted the above method challenging Schweitzer's claim about iron preservation here is what he replied' I don't trust anyone who doesn't cuss. (I told him resorting to profanities is the last ditch defense of the losing side ) He continues: I do not give a shit about your credentials.
I have mentioned probably hundreds of people with doctorates and who advanced science and the only time I've mentioned a doctorate degree is in citing Kent Hovind.
She eventually published a number of papers (references and links below) which right from the first challenged the basic principles of fossilization by stating, Soft tissues and cell-like microstructures derived from skeletal elements of a well-preserved Tyrannosaurus rex (MOR 1125) were represented by four components in fragments of demineralized cortical and/or medullary bone: flexible and fibrous bone matrix; transparent, hollow and pliable blood vessels; intravascular material, including in some cases, structures morphologically reminiscent of vertebrate red blood cells; and osteocytes with intracellular contents and flexible filipodia. Mary Schweitzer, states, When you think about it, the laws of chemistry, biology and and everything else we know, say it should be gone, it should be degraded completely.
(~) Derrick Briggs, curator of invertebrate paleontology at the Peabody Museum at Yale University agrees saying, Nobody was imaging that dinosaurs might have had preserved soft tissues. We have this clear understanding that part of all biological cycles involves decay. Schweitzer MH, Suo Z, Avci R, Asara JM, Allen MA, Teran Arce F, Horner JR. ****More detailed interview with the researchers & info in notes here: it was only a matter of time a new it big bang go's hand in hand with evolution to think all this came from an explotion is insane you really need HELP av never in all my life seen anything come to life after a bang lol unless it was planed by the hand of are loving god.bless kids will be so happy allover the world TO NO THAT A LOVING GOD CREATED ALL THIS FOR US BEATIFUL PEOPLE..bless her nobel prize in order discovery of a life time wow. They will go to any length to destroy evidence and cover it up.
Shout out to Justin Ove, Coda Buchanan, Lucy Mc Glasson, Accalia Elementia, Mark Terrio-Cameron, Saul, Kathy & Tim Philip, Kevin Bealer, Christopher Collins, Thomas J., charles george, Andreas Heydeck, Patrick D.
Mary Schweitzer, the same person who made the tissue discovery, did subsequent experiments to investigate why the dinosaur tissue was preserved, and discovered that the iron from hemoglobin actually form cross-linking networks in the tissue to preserve it.Lets not forget, all blood contains natural clotting agents. it is about what best explains the preservation IN SITU of soft tissue for 1000s if not 10s of millions of years.If I went to court testifying on the presence of soft tissue in bones using foreign blood spiked with EDTA as evidence for the age of a corpse, I think the defense council would tear me to threads.This bad science is rigged, and interested in hiding the facts. Not knowing isn't an argument against the scientific method -- it's the reason we use it. It contains at least 2 unproven propositions: The existence of a Supreme Being and that this Being created the universe.And not knowing doesn't justify rejecting evolution as the only existing scientific theory about species diversification. These cannot be known thru the scientific method, not at this time anyhow, since these propositions cannot in any way be replicated experimentally and are not subject to inductive reasoning. Listen so some of Richard Feynman's lectures on the scientific method.